-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Mon, 22 Nov 2004, @ @ at 14:00:43 -0500, when AC Martin wrote:
> Hi WilWilWil > On 22/11/2004 01:43 PM, you wrote: >> I will automatically move infected mails in quarantine folder and >> have a look manually. > I'm not sure what you mean here. Look manually to do what? Hopefully not > to examine sender addresses and then ask the sender if it was really > them. If you see my address as sender, I'll admit from now that it > wasn't I who sent it so there would be no need to ask me about it. :) Does someone notice that if an address book is stolen that only the address itself (the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] , without any name(s) in front of it) is used for resending SPAM? So, if a proper/"full" addressing is accepted as a standard "rule", eg. Pera Peric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, then a much better filtering might be applied against SPAM. Eg, if you receive a message with a FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] all the chances are I didn't send it, because I would send it as Mica Mijatovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. - -- Mica PGP key uploaded at: <http://pgp.mit.edu/> once just before breakfast <>o<> [Earth LOG: 82 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OS: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium with nestled ZipSlack(tm) 9.1 UMSDOS Linux, and with Bochs 2.1.1 with a small DLX Linux; and, for TB sometimes Libranet (Linux) 2.8.1, via Cross Over Office -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFBolw89q62QPd3XuIRAssVAJ45eeDIdFx/7X7oMfAMWdjQSivL1gCeMLb+ CeUpaHvM/uuIiLafa13eCGk= =aSqg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
