Robin Anson: > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 at 15:22:48 +0100, Privateofcourse wrote:> Hello TBUDL, > > I've done a bit of leg work, but it seems to me that the majority of > > so-called 'SPAM blocker/stopper' solutions don't and can't really do > > anything other than allow you to manage SPAM after-the-fact. That is, SPAM > > isn't actually blocked or stopped at all, but is managed after it has been > > received. > > I wouldn't use something that stopped or blocked SPAM for me. I don't trust > anyone else to make the decision about whether something is SPAM because I > have seen a small number, but that is too many, of emails incorrectly > classified as SPAM.
I support providers with good RBL filtering, that's the real solution. Content filtering is only useful to gather spam messages into a single folder, once you've downloaded them. I wouldn't use any mailbox with content filtering if it's the provider to manage it. -- Luca - e-mail: p.stevens at linuxfan.it ________________________________________________ Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
