On Jun 7, 2005, at 3:49 AM, Bruce M Simpson wrote:

 1) Compatibility of WinPcap vs libpcap -- it would be nice if we
could build both Win32 and UNIX versions from the same libpcap tree,
    but this is something we can work around at XORP makefile level;

Build Win32 and UNIX versions of XORP, or of libpcap?

If libpcap, what are the problems that prevent using standard libpcap/ WinPcap, built (if necessary) and installed (if necessary) from their source trees?

as I understand it from the current thread, WinPcap and libpcap are
    pretty much separate projects -- it would be nice if they could be
    re-integrated in the same way as libevent and libdnet are.

"Re-integrated" in what sense?

The WinPcap developers track what's done in libpcap, and contribute back their changes to the shared portions of the code.

However, unlike UN*Xes, which have a native packet capture mechanism that libpcap uses, Windows doesn't - WinPcap also includes drivers for Windows OT (95, 98, Me) and NT (NT4, W2K, WXP, W2K3) and libraries that talk to the driver, with the actual libpcap portion implemented atop the API provided by the library.

"Re-integrating" them would involve incorporating the driver and libraries into libpcap - you'd have to ask the WinPcap developers if that'd be acceptable - or having separate "packet driver" and "libpcap" projects, with the former being the driver and library for the driver. However, that'd run the risk of making the "packet driver" API a published API, and the WinPcap developers don't want that - they want to be able to change that API from release to release, if necessary, with the libpcap code changed to match.

It appears that libevent doesn't need to make additions of that sort to Windows. Libdnet handles that by assuming that the "packet driver" API is a published API; if it changes in a future WinPcap version, libdnet runs the risk of breaking.

2) Support for link-layer frame injection across most UNIX platforms and
    Win32 using libpcap.

WinPcap's had that for a while; I checked support for that on UN*X platforms into libpcap a while ago.

So basically to make that happen we need a libpcap which is portable
to Windows

The current libpcap source is probably portable to "Windows+the WinPcap driver and library", or could be made so; it's not portable to Windows without the driver and library (well, I guess you could use it to read and write savefiles, but that's about it).

and is capable of link layer writes.

WinPcap is capable of that, and libpcap 0.9 will be capable of that as well.

-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.

Reply via email to