+1.
Craig Everhart
On 3/16/15 5:50 PM, "ianG" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 16/03/2015 15:43 pm, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
>> We would like to ask the WG to express their support to adopt one (or
>> none) of the following documents as WG document that will serve as a
>> basis for the protocol specification. Of course, the draft, if adopted,
>> will need to updated according to the WG input. In particular, they need
>> to be updated to not protect the TCP header.
>>
>>
>> The candidate drafts are:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt/
>
>Tcpcrypt for me. It's up, working, got the experience.
>
>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tcpinc-tls-option/
>
>I just can't see grafting a heavyweight protocol into TCP as being a
>sensible path. Maybe I'm wrong, but I just don't see it.
>
>iang
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tcpinc mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
_______________________________________________
Tcpinc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
