Hi, I'm personally curious about the roadmap of the technology before thinking about this question. (The charter page seems to be a bit ambiguous on this point.) We can start from protecting data, but I think security stuff is moving target. Things might be changed in the future. Or, data protection is the only target anyway?
Thanks, -- Yoshi On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:43 AM, marcelo bagnulo braun <[email protected]> wrote: > We would like to ask the WG to express their support to adopt one (or > none) of the following documents as WG document that will serve as a basis > for the protocol specification. Of course, the draft, if adopted, will need > to updated according to the WG input. In particular, they need to be > updated to not protect the TCP header. > > > The candidate drafts are: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tcpinc-tls-option/ > > We plan to discuss this on the meeting but it would be useful to start the > discussion before the meeting, so if you can express your opinions before > the meeting, it would be helpful. > > Regards, marcelo (on behalf of the co chairs) > > _______________________________________________ > Tcpinc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc >
_______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
