> I think Arthur's comment was based on the theory that a lot of the code to be reviewed by a team may not be related to work that is not that team's priority.
Wouldn't that a misprioritization? On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Kevin Smith <ksm...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:25 AM, James Douglas <jdoug...@wikimedia.org> > wrote: > >> > staying focussed on their teams' priorities may in fact contribute to >> code review queues growing >> >> I disagree, unless the team's priority is "add to the code review queue". >> :] >> > > I think Arthur's comment was based on the theory that a lot of the code to > be reviewed by a team may not be related to work that is not that team's > priority. There was a lot of that in the old core team, where they had to > review code in a variety of areas, and doing so slowed their coding > progress on work directly related to their quarterly goal. If they stayed > purely focused on their own priorities, code reviews (of code written by > people outside their team) would pile up. > > Kevin > > > _______________________________________________ > teampractices mailing list > teampractices@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices > >
_______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list teampractices@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
