On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Gergo Tisza <gti...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> some large changes simply cannot be broken up into independent small ones > due to circular dependencies, unless you want to leave the code in a broken > state between commits (in which case you lose most of the advantage you > would get from breaking up the change). > I'm well aware of that, and totally agree with it. Broken code should never[1] be committed. I strongly believe that far more work can be done incrementally than most developers believe. But there definitely are cases that require a single large commit. [1] I think there are extremely rare exceptions, but "never" captures the essence.
_______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list teampractices@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices