tech-kern  

Messages by Date

• 2026/07/18 Re: ZFS tunable parameters Greg Troxel
• 2026/07/18 Re: ZFS tunable parameters Brad Spencer
• 2026/07/18 Re: ZFS tunable parameters Greg Troxel
• 2026/07/18 Re: ZFS tunable parameters Brad Spencer
• 2026/07/16 Re: increasing sysv semaphore limits Greg Troxel
• 2026/07/16 Re: increasing sysv semaphore limits Jason Thorpe
• 2026/07/16 Re: increasing sysv semaphore limits Greg Troxel
• 2026/07/16 Re: increasing sysv semaphore limits Greg Troxel
• 2026/07/16 Re: increasing sysv semaphore limits Jason Thorpe
• 2026/07/16 Re: increasing sysv semaphore limits Jason Thorpe
• 2026/07/16 Re: increasing sysv semaphore limits Mouse
• 2026/07/16 Re: increasing sysv semaphore limits Jörg Sonnenberger
• 2026/07/15 Re: increasing sysv semaphore limits Jason Thorpe
• 2026/07/15 Re: increasing sysv semaphore limits Greg Troxel
• 2026/07/15 Re: increasing sysv semaphore limits Mouse
• 2026/07/15 Re: increasing sysv semaphore limits Greg Troxel
• 2026/07/15 Re: increasing sysv semaphore limits Greg Troxel
• 2026/07/15 Re: increasing sysv semaphore limits Martin Husemann
• 2026/07/15 Re: increasing sysv semaphore limits Taylor R Campbell
• 2026/07/15 increasing sysv semaphore limits Greg Troxel
• 2026/07/14 Re: I wrote a little graphics thing Michael
• 2026/07/11 Re: uvm_swap v4 Taylor R Campbell
• 2026/07/06 Re: uvm_swap v4 Reinoud Zandijk
• 2026/07/06 Re: uvm_swap v4 Taylor R Campbell
• 2026/07/06 uvm_swap v4 Reinoud Zandijk
• 2026/07/03 uvm_swap v3 Reinoud Zandijk
• 2026/07/02 Re: uvm_swap v2 Taylor R Campbell
• 2026/07/02 Re: uvm_swap compression patch Taylor R Campbell
• 2026/07/02 Re: uvm_swap compression patch Mouse
• 2026/07/02 Re: uvm_swap compression patch Thor Lancelot Simon
• 2026/07/02 Re: uvm_swap compression patch Taylor R Campbell
• 2026/07/02 Re: uvm_swap compression patch Takashi YAMAMOTO
• 2026/07/02 Re: uvm_swap compression patch Reinoud Zandijk
• 2026/07/02 Re: uvm_swap compression patch Takashi YAMAMOTO
• 2026/07/01 uvm_swap v2 Reinoud Zandijk
• 2026/07/01 uvm_swap compression patch Reinoud Zandijk
• 2026/06/30 Re: [PATCH] Add posix_spawn_file_actions_addclosefrom_np Chris Hanson
• 2026/06/30 Re: [PATCH] Add posix_spawn_file_actions_addclosefrom_np Taylor R Campbell
• 2026/06/30 Re: [PATCH] Add posix_spawn_file_actions_addclosefrom_np Greg Troxel
• 2026/06/30 Re: [PATCH] Add posix_spawn_file_actions_addclosefrom_np Chris Hanson
• 2026/06/30 Re: [PATCH] Add posix_spawn_file_actions_addclosefrom_np Chris Hanson
• 2026/06/29 Re: [PATCH] Add posix_spawn_file_actions_addclosefrom_np Greg Troxel
• 2026/06/29 Re: [PATCH] Add posix_spawn_file_actions_addclosefrom_np Martin Husemann
• 2026/06/26 Re: linux clock compat Jan Stary
• 2026/06/26 linux clock compat Jan Stary
• 2026/06/26 Re: nonexistent clocks Jan Stary
• 2026/06/25 Re: ZFS tunable parameters Simon Burge
• 2026/06/25 Re: ZFS tunable parameters Sotiris Lamprinidis
• 2026/06/24 Re: ZFS tunable parameters Greg Troxel
• 2026/06/24 Re: ZFS tunable parameters Michael van Elst
• 2026/06/24 Re: poll(2)ing for USB device changes Taylor R Campbell
• 2026/06/24 Re: poll(2)ing for USB device changes Taylor R Campbell
• 2026/06/24 poll(2)ing for USB device changes Timo Buhrmester
• 2026/06/24 ZFS tunable parameters Sotiris Lamprinidis
• 2026/06/23 Re: I wrote a little graphics thing Michael
• 2026/06/20 Re: Linker error (multiple definition) during LD_STAGE 2 with custom scheduler Valery Ushakov
• 2026/06/20 Re: Linker error (multiple definition) during LD_STAGE 2 with custom scheduler Тимофей Масленников
• 2026/06/20 Re: Linker error (multiple definition) during LD_STAGE 2 with custom scheduler Valery Ushakov
• 2026/06/19 Re: Linker error (multiple definition) during LD_STAGE 2 with custom scheduler Martin Husemann
• 2026/06/19 Linker error (multiple definition) during LD_STAGE 2 with custom scheduler Тимофей Масленников
• 2026/06/19 Linker error (multiple definition) during LD_STAGE 2 with custom scheduler sewas1399
• 2026/06/16 Re: Introduction and project intent: Emulating missing linux syscalls Ilia Javan
• 2026/06/09 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Jason Thorpe
• 2026/06/09 Re: agp_nvidia port for review Andrius V
• 2026/06/09 Re: I wrote a little graphics thing Michael
• 2026/06/09 Re: I wrote a little graphics thing RVP
• 2026/06/09 Re: Clarification of CLOCK_MONOTONIC x85729201kza
• 2026/06/09 Re: agp_nvidia port for review Andrius V
• 2026/06/08 Re: agp_nvidia port for review Valery Ushakov
• 2026/06/08 Re: agp_nvidia port for review Andrius V
• 2026/06/08 Re: agp_nvidia port for review Andrius V
• 2026/06/08 Re: Clarification of CLOCK_MONOTONIC Robert Elz
• 2026/06/08 Re: Clarification of CLOCK_MONOTONIC Greg Troxel
• 2026/06/08 Re: Clarification of CLOCK_MONOTONIC Anders Magnusson
• 2026/06/08 Re: I wrote a little graphics thing Mouse
• 2026/06/08 Re: Clarification of CLOCK_MONOTONIC Taylor R Campbell
• 2026/06/08 Re: Clarification of CLOCK_MONOTONIC Greg Troxel
• 2026/06/08 Re: I wrote a little graphics thing Michael
• 2026/06/08 Re: agp_nvidia port for review Valery Ushakov
• 2026/06/08 Re: agp_nvidia port for review Andrius V
• 2026/06/08 Re: Clarification of CLOCK_MONOTONIC x85729201kza
• 2026/06/08 Re: agp_nvidia port for review Andrius V
• 2026/06/07 Re: agp_nvidia port for review Taylor R Campbell
• 2026/06/07 agp_nvidia port for review Andrius V
• 2026/06/07 Re: Clarification of CLOCK_MONOTONIC Andrew Cagney
• 2026/06/07 Re: Clarification of CLOCK_MONOTONIC Greg Troxel
• 2026/06/07 Re: Clarification of CLOCK_MONOTONIC Greg Troxel
• 2026/06/07 Clarification of CLOCK_MONOTONIC JJ
• 2026/06/05 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Reinoud Zandijk
• 2026/06/03 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Johnny Billquist
• 2026/06/03 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)
• 2026/06/03 Re: zfs and device name changes Takashi YAMAMOTO
• 2026/06/03 Re: I wrote a little graphics thing Mouse
• 2026/06/03 I wrote a little graphics thing Michael
• 2026/06/03 Re: Introduction and project intent: Emulating missing linux syscalls Stephen Borrill
• 2026/06/02 Introduction and project intent: Emulating missing linux syscalls Ilia Javan
• 2026/06/01 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. David Brownlee
• 2026/06/01 Re: zfs and device name changes Simon Burge
• 2026/06/01 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. is
• 2026/05/31 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Johnny Billquist
• 2026/05/31 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Jason Thorpe
• 2026/05/31 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Robert Elz
• 2026/05/31 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Jason Thorpe
• 2026/05/31 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Thor Lancelot Simon
• 2026/05/31 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Brad Spencer
• 2026/05/31 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Jason Thorpe
• 2026/05/31 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Jason Thorpe
• 2026/05/31 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Thor Lancelot Simon
• 2026/05/31 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Jason Thorpe
• 2026/05/31 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Jason Thorpe
• 2026/05/31 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Thor Lancelot Simon
• 2026/05/30 Re: [PATCH] workqueue(9): Allow requeueing Taylor R Campbell
• 2026/05/30 [PATCH] workqueue(9): Allow requeueing Taylor R Campbell
• 2026/05/30 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Anders Magnusson
• 2026/05/30 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Jason Thorpe
• 2026/05/30 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Jason Thorpe
• 2026/05/30 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Jason Thorpe
• 2026/05/28 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Hans Rosenfeld
• 2026/05/28 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Jason Thorpe
• 2026/05/28 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Thor Lancelot Simon
• 2026/05/28 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Jason Thorpe
• 2026/05/27 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Jason Thorpe
• 2026/05/27 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Jason Thorpe
• 2026/05/27 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Anders Magnusson
• 2026/05/27 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Anders Magnusson
• 2026/05/27 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Adrian Chadd
• 2026/05/27 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Thor Lancelot Simon
• 2026/05/27 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. David Brownlee
• 2026/05/27 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Thor Lancelot Simon
• 2026/05/27 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Johnny Billquist
• 2026/05/27 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Jason Thorpe
• 2026/05/27 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Johnny Billquist
• 2026/05/27 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Johnny Billquist
• 2026/05/27 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Jason Thorpe
• 2026/05/27 Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Hans Rosenfeld
• 2026/05/27 bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous. Jason Thorpe
• 2026/05/20 Re: smr(9) and pool_cache_set_smr(9) Taylor R Campbell
• 2026/05/19 Re: smr(9) and pool_cache_set_smr(9) Taylor R Campbell
• 2026/05/11 Re: [PATCH] Add posix_spawn_file_actions_addclosefrom_np Chris Hanson
• 2026/05/10 Re: i915drmkms debug log issue RVP
• 2026/05/10 Re: shadowfb artifacts when scrolling back. RVP
• 2026/05/08 Re: VFS_MOUNT reverses sense of IMNT_MPSAFE test? Rhialto
• 2026/05/07 re: VFS_MOUNT reverses sense of IMNT_MPSAFE test? matthew green
• 2026/05/07 VFS_MOUNT reverses sense of IMNT_MPSAFE test? Konrad Schroder
• 2026/05/04 Re: Patching the Synaptics driver to disable tap-to-click Brett Lymn
• 2026/05/04 Re: Patching the Synaptics driver to disable tap-to-click atomicules
• 2026/05/04 Re: regarding support of NFS versions Reinoud Zandijk
• 2026/05/03 Re: mount root hooks for non-disk-device devices Simon Burge
• 2026/05/02 Re: mount root hooks for non-disk-device devices Michael van Elst
• 2026/05/01 mount root hooks for non-disk-device devices Simon Burge
• 2026/04/29 shadowfb artifacts when scrolling back. is
• 2026/04/29 Re: i915drmkms debug log issue Rui-Xiang Guo
• 2026/04/28 Re: Patching the Synaptics driver to disable tap-to-click Brett Lymn
• 2026/04/28 Re: regarding support of NFS versions Ken Hornstein
• 2026/04/27 Patching the Synaptics driver to disable tap-to-click atomicules
• 2026/04/26 Re: smr(9) and pool_cache_set_smr(9) Kevin Bowling
• 2026/04/25 Re: eMMC failing in NetBSD-current Hudson Dalprá
• 2026/04/25 Re: regarding support of NFS versions od2uvb
• 2026/04/24 eMMC failing in NetBSD-current chld
• 2026/04/24 Re: regarding support of NFS versions (Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024?) Michael van Elst
• 2026/04/24 Re: regarding support of NFS versions Edgar Fuß
• 2026/04/24 Re: patch: shadowfb also for non-EFI boots David Brownlee
• 2026/04/24 Re: regarding support of NFS versions Mouse
• 2026/04/24 Re: regarding support of NFS versions Edgar Fuß
• 2026/04/24 Re: patch: shadowfb also for non-EFI boots Ignatios Souvatzis
• 2026/04/24 Re: regarding support of NFS versions (Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024?) Martin Husemann
• 2026/04/24 Re: regarding support of NFS versions Matthias Petermann
• 2026/04/24 Re: regarding support of NFS versions (Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024?) Adrian Chadd
• 2026/04/24 Re: regarding support of NFS versions Jonathan A. Kollasch
• 2026/04/24 Re: regarding support of NFS versions Edgar Fuß
• 2026/04/24 Re: Re: RFC: fullfs — disk-full simulation filesystem Hudson Dalprá
• 2026/04/23 Re: regarding support of NFS versions (Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024?) Michael van Elst
• 2026/04/23 Re: regarding support of NFS versions (Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024?) Michael van Elst
• 2026/04/23 Re: regarding support of NFS versions (Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024?) Adrian Chadd
• 2026/04/23 Re: regarding support of NFS versions (Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024?) Reinoud Zandijk
• 2026/04/22 Re: [PATCH] Add posix_spawn_file_actions_addclosefrom_np Chris Hanson
• 2026/04/21 Re: [PATCH] Add posix_spawn_file_actions_addclosefrom_np Chris Hanson
• 2026/04/21 smr(9) and pool_cache_set_smr(9) Kevin Bowling
• 2026/04/20 [PATCH] Add posix_spawn_file_actions_addclosefrom_np Chris Hanson
• 2026/04/20 Re: regarding support of NFS versions (Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024?) Matthias Petermann
• 2026/04/20 Re: tprof(8) ABI Martin Husemann
• 2026/04/19 Re: tprof(8) ABI Kevin Bowling
• 2026/04/19 regarding support of NFS versions (Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024?) od2uvb
• 2026/04/19 Re: tprof(8) ABI Kevin Bowling
• 2026/04/19 Re: tprof(8) ABI Martin Husemann
• 2026/04/19 Re: tprof(8) ABI Kevin Bowling
• 2026/04/19 Re: tprof(8) ABI Martin Husemann
• 2026/04/19 Re: tprof(8) ABI Kevin Bowling
• 2026/04/19 Re: Which way for posix_spawn close-on-exec improvements? Chris Hanson
• 2026/04/19 Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024? Piotr Meyer
• 2026/04/19 NFS security (was: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024?) Edgar Fuß
• 2026/04/19 Re: tprof(8) ABI Nick Hudson
• 2026/04/19 Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024? Mouse
• 2026/04/19 Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024? od2uvb
• 2026/04/18 Re: Which way for posix_spawn close-on-exec improvements? Roland Illig
• 2026/04/18 Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024? Mouse
• 2026/04/18 Re: Which way for posix_spawn close-on-exec improvements? Chris Hanson
• 2026/04/18 Re: Which way for posix_spawn close-on-exec improvements? Chris Hanson
• 2026/04/16 Re: Which way for posix_spawn close-on-exec improvements? Chris Hanson
• 2026/04/16 Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024? Michael van Elst

• Earlier messages