On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, David Holland wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 03:55:59AM +0000, Eduardo Horvath wrote: > > > What magic sauce do you have? Please share it - lfs has been broken > > > for everyone else. > > > > Dunno. Although I do disable fsck_lfs. It usually causes more problems > > than it solves. It needs a complete overhaul. It tries to act like > > fsck_ffs instead of validating segment checksums and regenerating the > > ifile. > > ...except that it also apparently can't actually repair most problems > it finds, which isn't very helpful of it. > > > A also haven't updated my sources for a while so I don't have to worry > > about DEV_BSIZE breakage. > > Do you feel up to testing my patch? It works for me for basic stuff, > although I didn't try pounding on it because it wasn't expected to work.
I'm a bit low on disk space at the moment, but if you build me a generic sparc64 kernel I can test it. Eduardo