On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:53:16AM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote: > > (FFS_EI isn't the only such option either, it's just one I happen to > > have already banged heads with.) > > This one is easy, no need to make it difficult.
Sure, but as I said it was just an example; what about the next one? > Things like wapbl are currently an actual problem, since it is multiply > owned (conf/files *and* ufs/files.ufs). I don't see why this is a problem either. The way things are right now, vfs_wapbl.c is conditional on "wapbl" the same as the rest; enforcing a hierarchical decomposition by source directory would break this but that's part of why such hierarchical decompositions are a bad idea. (I've also never fully understood why wapbl has to have so many tentacles hanging out of ffs, either.) -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org