>>> You need some kind of persistent state *somewhere*, to support >>> chmod, chown, mv, rm, etc. Or are you proposing to break those? >> My devfs doesn't do that complicate thing. > Wow, that sucks. Not being able to change permissions (and less > importantly, mv or rm the device files) would definitely be a > problem.
That was my own reaction too, but, y'know what? What Uebayashi-san suggests is just fine as a research experiment, and, if it succeeds there, on the road to production use it can grow such things. NetBSD is still a decent framework for minor OS research experiments like that, and I think that's as it should be. Of course, anyone who proposes to put it into NetBSD's main released tree without support for such things should be shouted down. Vociferously. And thoroughly. Lack of chmod/chown/etc in /dev would be a total showstopper (for me, at the very least) for production use. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
