On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:57:47AM +0100, Matthias Drochner wrote: > > dyo...@pobox.com said: > > (1) If a bus-bridge driver is not configured in the kernel, or if its > > module is unloaded, then the code is left out. > > I know... but if you add this to the commonly used "ppb" driver > there is no way to avoid it.
I will look to see how much the code size changes before and after. > > (2) Do you intend for the new methods to belong to a new API, or to > > bus_space(9)? What would the methods' names and contracts be? > > The new methods should be part of the pci(9) API. That kind of > bus space management is inherently bus specific. Do you think that bus_space_alloc(9) should go away, then? And what about bus_space_map(9)? Certainly I could introduce pci_space_alloc(9) with a similar signature as bus_space_alloc(). Dave -- David Young OJC Technologies dyo...@ojctech.com Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933
