On 15.08.2010 17:23, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 02:30:46PM +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote: >> >> Shall it be added for all other archs then? I assume that they can all >> benefit from the dynamic sysctl(9) interface? > > You can't do it for existing OIDs, that breaks binary compatibility.
Sure; I was just talking about the comment part, where we add a note that new sysctl(7) shall get added using the dynamic sysctl interface. -- Jean-Yves Migeon jeanyves.mig...@free.fr
