> > I'm just asking if "options INSECURE is mandaory to use autoloading," > > not module/autoloading is secure/silly/boo or not. > > No. As far as I can tell, there's a bug in the relevant kauth listener, > at least in terms of the original intent of the author of the autoloading > code; the system scope kauth listener should return DEFER, not DENY.
Okay, fair enough. Thanks. > However, I think it's a troublesome question whether this is really > the right policy to apply. : Well, it's another discussion how modules can be secure, which is out of my scope. --- Izumi Tsutsui
