>> Over 15 years ago NetBSD had a possibility to take everyone into >> account [...] > So what you are arguing is that MI needn't be so much MI anymore, and > that supporting anything more than mainstream today is more to be > considered a lucky accident than a desired goal?
Looks to me like pretty much exactly what pooka was saying. > Oh well! I guess I should go away now. And me, and everyone else running anything but x86_64 (and, maybe, i386; I don't know whether that's sufficiently modern to count). Compilers that page themselves to death unless given over twice the RAM a uV2 maxes out at. Decisions driven by "a megabyte of disk costs what, $0.00008?". Now this. bqt, wanna start a fork? Looks as though NetBSD no longer supports most of the architectures it used to. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
