On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 04:25:09PM +0000, Eduardo Horvath wrote:
> I think you're right.  While I'm pretty sure that curpg won't be NULL on 
> the first iteration, I think it can be NULL on subsequent iterations.  I'd 
> commit that change.

It shouldn't get there on subsequent iterations if it pulled a NULL out
of the TAILQ because it explicitily breaks out of the loop in that case.

Why do you think it can't happen initially?

Martin

Reply via email to