bou...@antioche.eu.org said: > To me it's not clear if it's the way to go (and I guess we'd need a > pci@pcibios as well ...
I think the pcibios gives so little value that it doesn't deserve an extra attachment. ACPI is another league - it is essential for interrupt routing and power management. Without it, you don't get correct interrupt routing on MP systems (unless you resort to MPIs...), and no system-wide power management on x86. > It has been argued before that attachement > at apci should go away I think it is OK to attach the PCI buses which are defined by ACPI at acpi. The attachment frontend can install hooks to get interrupt routing right. This would also help wakeup support for eg USB and ethernet devices. > and use apci to drive the isa autoconf instead ... My opinion on this is that we should get chips which are part of the platform (timer/RTC/PICs/npx) out of the "isa" section, so that one can use a modern PC without any isa bus configured. ACPI's help might or might be useful for that -- at least it would not be needed for a real ISA bus. best regards Matthias ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH 52425 Juelich Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDirig Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem (Vorsitzender), Dr. Ulrich Krafft (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt, Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
