On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:36:54PM -0400, Mouse wrote: > > (I think it would probably be more effective, if not as > > retro-attractive, to define a new 36-bit architecture... this would > > make a bunch of routine stuff easier and allow concentrating on the > > 36-bit issues.) > > Good point. Who wants to draw up an architecture? If nobody else > does, I'd be happy to create and float a strawman draft.
I certainly could, although I don't know enough about hardware implementation to avoid doing stupid stuff. But, maybe this should get out of the cpufreq(9) thread... -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
