In article <46DA345771B043F283B5E67C674DAA76@desktop>, Adam Hoka <adam.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi! > >If no one argues otherwise, I would like to import chewiefs to the NetBSD >tree. > >The import would have minimal impact on existing code, but would allow for >broader testing of the code and a step towards a more embedded ready NetBSD.
I think that we should choose a more descriptive name for it. Having cute project names is good during development, but we need meaningful names for posterity that make sense to people. Imagine if we had named nfs cutefs, ffs kirkfs, etc. christos