hi, > Thor Lancelot Simon <t...@panix.com> writes: > >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:50:58PM +0400, Aleksej Saushev wrote: >>> Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rm...@netbsd.org> writes: >>> >>> > y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote: >>> >> hi, >>> >> >>> >> what's the status of emap and pipe? >>> >> >>> > >>> > ... and encourage our users to use amd64 instead >>> > of i386. >>> >>> I'm sorry to intervene, what about WINE? Unless we're going to have it >>> functional on amd64, encouraging is useless. >> >> I don't understand your comment. Are you suggesting that a large fraction of >> NetBSD/i386 users use WINE and therefore would not be able to switch to the >> amd64 port? > > I mean that those users who could switch most probably have switched already. > And one of serious reasons to stay on i386 is functional WINE.
as we now have non-stack-based pthread_self (thanks joerg), porting the recent versions of wine should not be too hard. does it help wine on amd64? YAMAMOTO Takashi > > > -- > HE CE3OH...