hi, what's the intention of the move of the VOP_ACCESS call in ufs_lookup.c rev.1.112? the old place seems better to me.
YAMAMOTO Takashi > On Mar 14, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Martin Husemann wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 06:41:18PM +0000, Elad Efrat wrote: >>> Log Message: >>> Replace the remaining KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER authorization calls with >>> something meaningful. All relevant documentation has been updated or >>> written. >>> >>> Most of these changes were brought up in the following messages: >>> >>> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2012/01/18/msg012490.html >>> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2012/01/19/msg012502.html >>> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2012/02/17/msg012728.html >>> >>> Thanks to christos, manu, njoly, and jmmv for input. >>> >>> Huge thanks to pgoyette for spinning these changes through some build >>> cycles and ATF. >> >> This seems to cause deadlocks in the *fs_rename_dir tests. >> See recent (new) test failures both on i386 and amd64 in fs/vfs/t_vnops. >> To reprocuce, do: >> >> cd /usr/tests/fs/vfs >> atf-run t_vnops | atf-report > > Should be fixed now with latest rev. of ext2fs_lookup.c and ufs_lookup.c. > > -- > Juergen Hannken-Illjes - hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de - TU Braunschweig (Germany)