On Jan 10, 6:41am, m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus) wrote: -- Subject: Re: Equivalent of FreeBSD kernel semaphore?
| Emmanuel Dreyfus <m...@netbsd.org> wrote: | | > I am not sure I correctly understand what you mean: is it that we do not | > have an equivalent of NetBSD's struct sema, and that it would need to be | > implemented using mutex and condvar? | | Looking at FreeBSD implementation, it seems almost trivial to import it | in our kernel: we just have to s/struct mtx/kmutex_t/ | | Is it desirable to import it in the kernel, or should it stay in the | DADHI driver? I don't know, is it useful outside DAHDI? Does DAHDI really need it? christos
