On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:17:42PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > assuming ncr53c9x is MP-safe, it is correct.
Just out of curiosity: assuming it isn't, what would be different? Martin
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:17:42PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > assuming ncr53c9x is MP-safe, it is correct.
Just out of curiosity: assuming it isn't, what would be different? Martin