On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:25:23AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote: > > I like the kern.module.supported, or perhaps kern.module.enabled, as I > > have systems built without module loading support yet still have a few > > module sysctls around under that same hierarchy, and module.modular > > also seems ambiguous and redundant... > > The question is complex, so I am for realy simple solutions. > > kern.module.modular = 1 > > means: options MODULAR was active when the kernel was built. If we go any > further, it gets tricky.
I wasn't suggesting going further. I'm just opposed to the word "modular" because it carries a bunch of baggage... baggage that has created contention and strife in the past. kern.module.supported = 1 means the same thing without this disadvantage. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
