I think additional fields have been added to the RAIDframe component label to deal with larger drives. However, I neither know whether these changes have made it into 5.1 nor why the additional fields are not zeroed out in your setup.
- Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size Edgar Fuß
- Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size Greg Oster
- Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size Edgar Fuß
- Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size Eduardo Horvath
- Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size Edgar Fuß
- Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size Eduardo Horvath
- Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size Greg Oster
- Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size Edgar Fuß
- Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size Greg Oster
- Strange problem with raidframe under NetBSD-5.1 Brian Buhrow
- Re: Strange problem with raidframe under NetBSD-5.1 Edgar Fuß
- Re: Strange problem with raidframe under NetBSD-... Michael van Elst
- Re: Strange problem with raidframe under NetBSD-5.1 Greg Oster
- Re: Strange problem with raidframe under NetBSD-... Brian Buhrow
- Re: Strange problem with raidframe under Net... Brian Buhrow
- Re: Strange problem with raidframe under Net... Greg Oster
- re: Strange problem with raidframe under NetBSD-... matthew green
- re: Strange problem with raidframe under Net... matthew green
- re: Strange problem with raidframe under Net... matthew green