On Jun 12, 2012, at 8:26 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote: > On Jun 13, 2:15am, y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote: > -- Subject: Re: lwp resource limit > > | > Can you explain what you mean by api incompatible? It is used in > getrlimit the > | > same way we use it, how can it be different? > | > | it's semantics (what's counted for) is different, isn't it? > > I don't know, the pages I looked don't offer details.
The nice thing about our semantics is you can disable threaded programs by setting lwp count to 0 but still allow non-threaded programs to run.