On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:03:42 +0000 David Holland <dholland-t...@netbsd.org> wrote:
> I believe the situation with both mfs and lfs is that some pieces of > the support are in place but not others. It was clear when hacking up > the code that neither had actually been tried by anyone in a long, > long time... I admit myself not having tried LFS again after the advent of WAPBL, and only having used MFS to boot small custom userlands using crunchgen(1) long ago (floppy disks :) -- Matt
