On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 12:24:33PM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote: > >Well, in the case of the BBU it would be better to display good or bad. > >ABSENT would be misleading, becase what we really want to report > >is that the BBU is present but bad. > > I'm sure we could come up with dozens of pairs of values, GOOD/BAD, > TRUE/FALSE, PRESENT/ABSENT, CRITICAL/NORMAL, ...
They won't all be pairs either (e.g., ABSENT/DISABLED/ENABLED). You want support for enumeration types... I haven't looked at the code at all, but I'd expect it won't be all that difficult. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
