Hello. If running 5.1 or 5.2 is acceptable for you, you could run ffs+softdep since it has all the namei fixes in it. -Brian
`i On Nov 28, 5:15pm, Edgar =?iso-8859-1?B?RnXf?= wrote: } Subject: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems } > I seem to be facing two problems: } > } > 1. A certain svn update command is ridicously slow on my to-be file server. } > 2. During the svn update, the machine partially locks up and fails to respond } > to NFS requests. } Thanks to very kind help by hannken@, I now at least know what the problem is. } } Short form: WAPBL is currently completely unusable on RAIDframe (I always } suspected something like that), at least on non-Level 0 sets. } } The problem turned out to be wapbl_flush() writing non-fsbsize chunks on non- } fsbsize boundaries. So RAIDframe is nearly sure to RMW. } That makes the log being written to disc at about 1MB/s with the write lock } on the log being held. So everything else on that fs tstiles on the log's } read lock. } } Anyone in a position to improve that? I could simply turn off logging, but then } any non-clean shutdown is sure to take ages. >-- End of excerpt from Edgar =?iso-8859-1?B?RnXf?=