> ps: I had been meaning to rant like this for some time, your message just > provided the incentive today!
:-) i will note that i'm also a fan of using -o async FFS mounts in the right place. i just wouldn't do it for a file server :-)
> ps: I had been meaning to rant like this for some time, your message just > provided the incentive today!
:-) i will note that i'm also a fan of using -o async FFS mounts in the right place. i just wouldn't do it for a file server :-)