Re: MACHINE_ARCH on NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current

[Matt Thomas]

On Oct 26, 2013, at 5:45 AM, Izumi Tsutsui <tsut...@ceres.dti.ne.jp> wrote:

> By static MACHINE_ARCH, or dynamic sysctl(3)?
> If dynamic sysctl(3) is prefered, which node?

hw.machine_arch

which has been defined for a long long time.