> > By static MACHINE_ARCH, or dynamic sysctl(3)? > > If dynamic sysctl(3) is prefered, which node? > > hw.machine_arch > > which has been defined for a long long time.
Yes, defined before sf vs hf issue arised, and you have changed the definition (i.e. make it dynamic) without public discussion. That's the problem. --- Izumi Tsutsui
