On 04.04.2014 18:55, Christos Zoulas wrote: > On Apr 4, 6:40pm, net...@izyk.ru (Ilya Zykov) wrote: > -- Subject: Re: Enhance ptyfs to handle multiple instances. > > | > > | > Should we put a pointer in the pty node that points to the primary mount > point > | > then so we get the correct one? > | > | Why? In general case we forever must return first which mount first, next > mount point, > | shouldn't replace previous, else incorrect TIOCPTMGET(path) for already > opened pty we will have. > | Simple appends it to the tail will be good(IMHO). > > I have to think about it. If you opened a pty in a chroot, the pty node > will appear both in the chroot and in the regular mount. If you opened > a pty outside the chroot, the pty will appear only in the regular mount > and not in the chroot, right? If you have 2 chroots, each one will only > show its own ptys, but the regular not rooted mount will show all of them? >
Maybe I do not understand you correctly. No. Every is in proper MP.