On Mon, 05 May 2014, Christos Zoulas wrote: > I wrote: > >So can someone suggest where exactly the patch should go. And > >isn't proc_lock held at this point (entered at line 344, exit at > >line 569)? > > How about this?
Seems good to me and can confirm that its fixed the increasing proc count problem. Can someone commit and pull up to 6? cheers mark
