On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:57:11AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 06:51:06PM +0900, Ryota Ozaki wrote: > > >> Any comments? > > > > > > why not change in6_if_link_up() to use a delay >= 1 instead of 0 ? > > > > My change intends to make it clear whether a callout will be used > > or not. I think it's error-prone. > > for me, it's clear that a timeout of 0 means immediately, and so a > callout is not needed.
It's an ugly old technique to defer execution to non-interrupt context, is it not, dating from before we had the softint framework? It was all over the original RNG code (I ripped it out). Thor
