On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Christos Zoulas wrote:

> In article <53f1c72d.9070...@m00nbsd.net>,
> Maxime Villard  <m...@m00nbsd.net> wrote:
> >Also, I get several
> >
> >     panic(XX);
> >     return;/break;/continue;
> >
> >in many places; it's ok if I start removing these return;/break;/continue;?
>
> I'd fix them. But wait for couple more people to chime in.

for the non returning functions with code after, I'd say that all the
compilers currently known to be able to used with NetBSD should handle it
without complaint, since the __dead keyword is understood. However, lint
does not understand attributes..

(not saying yes or no)

regards,
iain

Reply via email to