On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Christos Zoulas wrote: > In article <53f1c72d.9070...@m00nbsd.net>, > Maxime Villard <m...@m00nbsd.net> wrote: > >Also, I get several > > > > panic(XX); > > return;/break;/continue; > > > >in many places; it's ok if I start removing these return;/break;/continue;? > > I'd fix them. But wait for couple more people to chime in.
for the non returning functions with code after, I'd say that all the compilers currently known to be able to used with NetBSD should handle it without complaint, since the __dead keyword is understood. However, lint does not understand attributes.. (not saying yes or no) regards, iain