Oops, I didn't notice that I already committed the patch. I'm sorry for that.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Darren Reed <darr...@netbsd.org> wrote: > Looking at the patch, the comment reads: > > We can assume that ifp->if_dl is the same as ifnet_addrs[ifp->if_index] > so we can replace ifnet_addrs[ifp->if_index] with ifp->if_dl and > remove ifnet_addrs entirely. > > The word "assume" is not very precise and suggests that you're > not 100% sure. Either it is the same and the patch is right or it > isn't the same and the patch is wrong. No assumptions. They're always the same, so I should get rid of "We can assume that"... ozaki-r > > Drren >