> The current code operates on full sectors and encodes the sector number > into the data. > > Modifying this to encode multiple 512 byte blocks instead and using > block numbers instead of sector numbers looks straight forward to me. > > We just have to decide if that is a good thing. Or maybe it needs to > be configurable?
i think it should use 512 byte crypto blocks in all cases, using offset in DEV_BSIZE units as part of the IV, at least by default. that would at least allow data to be recovered, by default, from the wrong sized media. .mrg.
