On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 10:52:18AM +0000, Michael van Elst wrote: > mlel...@serpens.de (Michael van Elst) writes: > >The bizarre disklabel seems to be another problem. > > vnd.c says: > /* > * For historical reasons, if there's no disklabel > * present, all partitions must be FS_BSDFFS and > * occupy the entire disk. > */ > > Works as designed.
I'm not convinced that means it isn't a problem :-) (do we have any idea what the historical reasons are?) -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
