Hi,
We all agree that filemon(4) is an ugly hack. It probably should never have gotten committed. But it is there now, and there are a (very) few use-cases. So we don't want to remove it without having a replacement implementation.
Well, can you explain? Why would we not want to remove it and be done with that nonsense? Ciao, Wolfgang -- wolfg...@solfrank.net Wolfgang Solfrank
