In article <20160224031758.7a34b60...@jupiter.mumble.net>, Taylor R Campbell <campbell+netbsd-tech-k...@mumble.net> wrote: > Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:08:46 +0000 (GMT) > From: Robert Swindells <r...@fdy2.co.uk> > > Would there be any objection to the following patch, it makes it easier > to see in top(1) which thing a process is waiting for. > >The rule is that wchan messages should be at most 8 characters (see, >e.g., condvar(9)). These wchan messages satisfy that, as far as I can >tell. Maybe top(1) should be adjusted to show all 8 characters >instead?
It is 6 now because of /<n>... christos
