In article <11591.1462907...@splode.eterna.com.au>, matthew green <m...@eterna.com.au> wrote: >Thor Lancelot Simon writes: >> I do not think you should do any extra work to support kvm grovelling. > >existing tool functionality should not be broken, however. the >netstat -i groveller code should be either updated to the new >method or converted to a real sysctl, though the current work >around would be ok for now. simply breaking netstat -i is not >an acceptable solution.
I will fix netstat, don't worry about it. christos