In article <11591.1462907...@splode.eterna.com.au>,
matthew green  <m...@eterna.com.au> wrote:
>Thor Lancelot Simon writes:
>> I do not think you should do any extra work to support kvm grovelling.
>
>existing tool functionality should not be broken, however.  the
>netstat -i groveller code should be either updated to the new
>method or converted to a real sysctl, though the current work
>around would be ok for now.  simply breaking netstat -i is not
>an acceptable solution.

I will fix netstat, don't worry about it.

christos

Reply via email to