On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Paul Goyette <p...@whooppee.com> wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jun 2016, Ryota Ozaki wrote: > >>> Perhaps the name should be `curlwp_bound_restore' or something else to >>> emphasize this, but I haven't come up with one that I like better on >>> aesthetic grounds. >> >> >> - curlwp_bind and curlwp_unbind >> - curlwp_bound_set and curlwp_bound_restore >> - curlwp_bound and curlwp_boundx >> >> Any other ideas? :) > > > - curlwp_bind and curlwp_bindx ? > > (I like x for exit, and prefer a present-tense verb vs past tense.)
Sure. Actually curlwp_unbind implies that it tries to clear the flag as joerg confused. And x is familiar for us (because of splx) and it implies that it tries to restore the original state. (but I'm not sure it's really better than the others.) Anyway I prepared another patch for curlwp_bindx: http://www.netbsd.org/~ozaki-r/curlwp_bindx.diff ozaki-r