Taylor R Campbell <campbell+netbsd-tech-k...@mumble.net> wrote: > This is a compromise between preserving the functionality and reducing > attack surface for what I hypothesize are a majority of users who do > not use it. Under this proposal, the code will remain, and still be > built, and still be usable -- it will just not be enabled by default.
Once every compatibility module would not loaded by default, pehaps the compat_xxx module could be loaded automatically if /emul/xxx/ exists? The presence of that hierarchy means the system administrator really meant to use compat_xxx, and it would avoid breaking existing system at upgrade time. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz m...@netbsd.org
