> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:55:27 +0100
> From: Edgar Fuß <e...@math.uni-bonn.de>
>
> > struct psref {
> > - LIST_ENTRY(psref) psref_entry;
> > + SLIST_ENTRY(psref) psref_entry;
> > + /* To keep ABI with LIST_ENTRY(psref) version. */
> > + void *psref_unused0;
> Isn't it somewhat fishy to manally pad this, knowing how big a [S]LIST_ENTRY
> is? Wouldn't it be cleaner to use a union?
Also fine by me, but a little more work to implement. Feel free to
add some ctasserts to raise your confidence in this. I don't expect
LIST_ENTRY or SLIST_ENTRY to change, but I don't mind assertions to
add additional confidence.
