Le 25/07/2018 à 16:09, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit :
On 25.07.2018 16:01, Maxime Villard wrote:
Le 25/07/2018 à 15:54, Siddharth Muralee a écrit :
Hello,
        While going through sys/arch/amd64/pmap.h, I came across
KERN_BASE[1] and confused it for KERNBASE[2]. Looking deeper into the
same I think someone made the same mistake in dtrace_isa.c{3](I might
be wrong).
      I compared how the same variable was used in amd64[4] and
i386[5]. There seems to be a mismatch. I computed the values for
KERN_BASE and KERNBASE for amd64 and

   * KERN_BASE = 0x800000000000
   * KERNBASE = 0xffffffff80000000

I think this may be an error. However, the names are definitely a bit
confusing and there is no documentation to suggest what they are for.

They are not the same. KERNBASE is the base where .text etc are located.
KERN_BASE is where the kernel map begins (VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS).

In fact, KERN_BASE is incorrect, there should be a VA_SIGN_NEG() around the
multiplication. I've always known this, but I don't know if it's really
harmful, so by default I've never fixed it.

I propose to either rename or fix KERN_BASE according to VA_SIGN_NET().

These names are confusing.

The confusion likely comes from i386. On i386, VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS and
KERNBASE are equal.

The only dtrace user I see is dtrace_toxic_ranges(). I'm not sure what's
going on down there, but I think we want to exclude all of userland. So
the call should probably just be:

        (*func)(0, VM_MAX_ADDRESS)

Then we remove KERN_BASE.

Reply via email to