> On Dec 14, 2018, at 6:19 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de> wrote: > Asymmetrical cryptography is slow and complex. On many architectures, > the kernel will only be able to use slower non-SIMD implementations. ECC > still easily requires 10k cycles per operation. The implementation is > non-trivial in terms of code size and historically riddled with tiny > tricky issues ranging from corner cases in the math to timing. I haven't > yet heard a really good argument why the key exchange must be part of > the kernel beyond the inability of the Linux community to coordinate > different projects. Agreed, it's best if that stuff is done in user space. -- thorpej
- Importing libraries for the kernel Ryota Ozaki
- Re: Importing libraries for the kernel maya
- Re: Importing libraries for the kernel Greg Troxel
- Re: Importing libraries for the kernel Ryota Ozaki
- Re: Importing libraries for the kernel Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: Importing libraries for the kernel Ryota Ozaki
- Re: Importing libraries for the kernel Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: Importing libraries for the kerne... Jason Thorpe
- Re: Importing libraries for the kerne... Mouse
- Re: Importing libraries for the ... Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: Importing libraries for ... Paul.Koning
- Re: Importing libraries for ... Mouse
- Re: Importing libraries for the kerne... Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: Importing libraries for the ... Martin Husemann