Agreed. I think they (especially osf1) should go, but new thread warranted.
-- thorpej Sent from my iPhone. > On Mar 9, 2019, at 4:38 AM, Jonathan A. Kollasch <jakll...@kollasch.net> > wrote: > >> On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 11:28:05AM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote: >> Re-reading this thread - which was initially about SVR4 but which diverged in >> all directions -, I see there were talks about retiring COMPAT_ULTRIX and >> COMPAT_OSF1, because these were of questionable utility, in addition to being >> clear dead wood (in terms of use case, commits in these areas, and ability to >> test changes). >> >> Does anyone have anything to say? > > Possibly, although I doubt they'll notice they want to say something in > this thread with the current Subject line... I'd suggest starting a > new thread, possibly CCing port-pmax@ and port-alpha@ as relevant. > > Jonathan Kollasch