> On Mar 23, 2019, at 11:39 PM, Maxime Villard <m...@m00nbsd.net> wrote: > >> There's a funny historical reason for this -- Linux on Alpha originally >> used OSF/1 syscall numbering and args for its own native syscalls. >> No, our implementation need not actually reflect that -- but it's an >> interesting historical detail perhaps we should write down somewhere. > > Does that mean we don't need these syscalls? We do, if we want Linux emulation to work. I'll review your patch in a just a moment. -- thorpej
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats Johnny Billquist
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats Maxime Villard
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats Paul Goyette
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats Maxime Villard
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats Jason Thorpe
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats David Holland
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats Maxime Villard
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats Jason Thorpe
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats Maxime Villard
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats Jason Thorpe
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats Robert Elz
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats Maxime Villard
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats David Holland
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats maya
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats Jason Thorpe
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats Maxime Villard
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats Jason Thorpe
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats Paul Goyette
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats maya
- Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats Maxime Villard