> and I'm making a proposal to disable this feature, to prevent this trouble > in the future. Nothing controversial about that, it just makes sense. > > You are not worth my time. Would you mind taking a deep breath and realize that I'm NOT OBJECTING to your proposal?
I was just trying to say that, in my opinion, you are doing neither yourself nor your valid proposal a favour by trying to back your proposal with controversal or disputable claims (about compat_linux user base, its usefulness or usability)---claims that are unnecessary (or so I think) for backing your proposal. The point I was objecting to was your claim that compat_linux was of "little actual use" (because, for me, it's vital for keeping my file server running NetBSD).
